|
‘We
were mugged’ claims angry Dev (Story posted 12.09.02)
MAIDENHEAD
United manager Alan Devonshire was incandescent with rage after
Tuesday nights defeat to Aldershot Town, when his side were
denied victory by what he saw as two appaling decisions by the men
in black.
Stalking into the club boardroom after the game, the fiery former
England star was positively seething, particularly over the Shots
highly controversial penalty.
He said: We were mugged. I just cant believe the referee
gave that decision.
Hes five yards away and he defers the decision to the
linesman 20 yards away.
In the second half the linesman gave us a free-kick on the
edge of the box and the referee just waved play on.
Why cant they leave the result to the football!
He also vented his spleen over Uniteds disallowed goal in
the second half, saying: I couldnt see anything wrong
with it.
After the match, the linesman said the guy in the middle was
interfering with play.
But the cross went straight to the back post. How can he be
interfering with play?
And Morley was arriving from the wing-back position, so he
couldnt have been offside.
However, there was little debate about the careless manner in which
United conceded the vital second goal, when fleet-footed striker
Roscoe DSane sprinted through a static defence to poke home
the winner.
Devonshire explained It was a glaring mistake, but when the
boy (Chris Elsegood) walked in after the game he put his hands up.
It was a mistake and hell learn from it.
However, the general consensus in the ground was that United had
actually played pretty well, considering they were facing a team
made up of former league players.
Two particular examples spring to mind, in the shape of Paul Moody
and Karl Ready.
Moody signed for the Shots over the summer from Oxford United
who had paid a reported £150,000 for 35-year-old striker,
only 10 months earlier while Ready was playing his football
in the Scottish Premier last year, having previously been a regular
for QPR and Wales.
But Devonshire claimed this did not excuse the defeat.
He said: We didnt pass as well as we have been, but
there was only one team who wanted to play football last night.
I thought Aldershot were there to be beaten, but we didnt
do it and they ended up winning 2-1.
Its more frustrating than disappointing, because at
the end of the day the result was taken out of our hands.
The defeat was perhaps made harder to bear by Uniteds 1-1
draw against lowly Enfield on Saturday, when the Magpies surrendered
a half-time lead to return home with a single point.
Devonshire said: It was disappointing. We played quite well
at times and should have had the game won by half-time.
We had lots of chances but then we slipped up at the back.
But I dont want to be too critical of the boys.
Were trying to build a side and were getting better
and better.
Everyone is saying we should beat these teams, but why should
we beat them? Theyre good sides as well.
We got a point. It should have been three, but its better
than none.
Tomorrow (Saturday), United entertain Bedford Town at York Road,
with Tuesday night bringing an away trip to Harrow Borough.
Devonshire said: Theyre both hard games.
Okay, weve played four or five of the biggest sides,
but these games are just as difficult in different ways.
Im hoping we can just play our football and not get
any poor refereeing decisions.
|